How to energize your BPM? Use AAA! January 18, 2010
Posted by Sanooj Kutty in Business Process Management, Enterprise Content Management.Tags: bpm, business analysis, business process automation, Business Process Management, change management, ecm, requirements management
5 comments
You guessed it right, one of the 3 A-s is Analysis. But, obviously.
To me, though, this carries the least priority compared to the other 2. During the course of my career from a fledgling Web Programmer to an Internet Marketer to a Document Management Consultant to a Business Process Consultant, I have learnt that the other 2 A-s have a bigger role. Agenda and Answers.
So, how does BPM energize itself on these AAA-s? Every BPM professional needs to analyze a process, but the path to Analysis is easier read than tread.
Agenda
Business Process Management is not easy. In fact, it probably is more hated by Business Users than anything else, well, except Audit maybe.
- Heads of Business Units who have run personal fiefdoms find their decisions and their management now being questioned by the “Process” and go on the defensive or in some cases, very aggressive.
- User find themselves being told to do the same task in a different way because it does not align with the “Process” and start opposing or hating it.
- Senior Management looks excited and claim that they now get “Transparency” and “Metrics” .
Welcome to the world of AGENDA. Every stakeholder in a business has an agenda, some constructive, some delaying, some destructive. No Business Process can thrive without their participation. As a BPM professional, it is imperative that you keep your eyes, ears and James Bond attentive to the different agendas that you will have to cross paths or swords with.
Free advice: Senior Management buy-in alone is never enough. Generals can strategize but you need the Captains to lead on the field and the Soldier to pull the trigger to win the War.
Answers
Thankfully, not all stakeholders have Agendas. Some good Samaritans do come along the way who have the answers. As a BPM analyst, it is critical that you find them and take them into confidence. Be aware that most of them cannot afford to expose themselves due to fear of the “Agenda” folk. Remember, all honest answers need not be the right answers. If the source of answer is fearful of exposure, most likely, they are less exposed to the bigger picture. But, isn’t that why we have the “Analysis”?
Free advice: Never ever expose them. Never ever blindly believe them.
Analysis
Finally as a BPM professional, you are ready to do your job. Although the principles for BPM analysis remains the same, be sure to keep the Agenda and Answers in mind when you do so. While BPM allows for an organization to improve and manage better, it is important for the BPM analyst not to step into the shoes of Business Unit Management and Users.
Free advice: You can never satisfy all the Agenda and you can never include all the Answers. Apply due diligence and prudent decisions when you do your Analysis.
IT – Best friend to Business in BPM? December 21, 2009
Posted by Sanooj Kutty in Business Process Management, Enterprise Content Management, General.Tags: bpm, business analysis, business process automation, Business Process Management, ecm, Enterprise Content Management, requirements management
8 comments
Plenty have been written on the legendary battle between Business and IT. Over time different roles including Business Analysts and Application Consultants have been introduced to narrow the gap. Models like UML, BPMN, EPC, etc. have also been developed to further narrow this. Yet, have we really forged a peace treaty? I doubt it!
Why else do we find ECM and BPM projects go haywire? In fact, these solutions have probably further divided a relationship that can surely compare with some of the very popular theological and political wars and pseudo-wars that engulf the world today.
It has been unanimously known and acknowledged that communication confusions have been the key reason for this blow-hot-blow-cold war. I see it different. I believe it is not communication, but more cultural and social. Just as an Indian and an American may be capable of speaking english, yet, they may not necessarily communicate in the right manner because of colloquial nuances and cultural and social differences.
In BPM projects, IT can become the best friend or the worst enemy for Business Units. I recommend managing your relationship with IT as stated below to get them to deliver your requirements.
Know what you Need and Specify what you Want.
Business Unit: “I want Food.”
IT: “Here’s your Cheese burger”.
Business Unit: “But, I wanted Lasagne.”
IT: “You should have mentioned it earlier”
Business Unit: “You didn’t tell me. How do I know what you can cook? You are supposed to consult us.”
And so it goes on. A bit of a Chicken-and-Egg story here. But, lets be clear and honest. If you want something in particular, you have to be specific about it. Business Units need guiding and consulting for sure, but, you must
also know exactly what you want and have in mind. Systems are not build or modified on wishes. As they say, ” If wishes were horses…”
Sometimes, we do this! Sometimes, we do that!
Every process has a procedure to execute as guided by the policy. What may be missing, is a clear Policy and Procedure document. What is most likely to be missing, is Exception handling in the P & P. No BPM system comes pre-packaged with your business rules and decisions. While BPM systems are malleable and ductile, they are not self-modifying. You need to flatten them or lengthen them explicitly. IT may be used to define and modify your “process map”, but you have to be the ones laying down the laws.
But, thats Finance’s responsibility, not ours! Ask them!
Quite normal for one Business Unit to be ignorant of another’s tasks. This is easily accepted as each BU is only expected to be masters at their core competence. Yet, when it comes to IT, expectations tend to sky rocket. They must be masters at the nitty gritties of all BUs. IT is also a Unit within Business like Sales or Finance. Isn’t it unfair for them to be MBA qualified? Support and hand hold them through your business requirements and they will breeze you through the technology.
Knowledge is a Handshake.
While IT is definitely a more technical department, they must have basic business comprehension qualities. Yet, surprisingly, BUs are not expected to have any basic IT knowledge. Green IT initiatives and paper cost savings are leading organizations to BPM and ECM. It now becomes more necessary for BUs to understand the basics of how technology works and its limitations. Knowledge is a handshake and both BUs and IT need to share this. A case for Knowledge Management?
ECM meets BCG Matrix December 6, 2009
Posted by Sanooj Kutty in Business Process Management, Enterprise Content Management.Tags: bcg, bcg matrix, bcgmatrix, bpm, Business Process Management, content management, document management, ecm, Enterprise Content Management, requirements management
2 comments
Although the BCG Matrix is primarily a product life-cycle matrix, it has always captured a special position from my university and marketing days. Even with its constraints, it provides a good overview and has hence survived time and challenges from other models.
One of the key challenges for me in ECM has been to map the role of various content and their role in terms of regulatory compliance and operational performance. Here I find a modified BCG Matrix has a good start as depicted in the sample diagram below:
When used in a Business Process, placing the content in the BCG Matrix creates 4 categories in the content portfolio of the process:
Question Marks
Question Marks are content that have high regulatory importance and as a result requires attention while managing them. At the same time, they may seem to be a hinderance or have a slow-down effect on the operational performance of a process.
Dogs
Dogs have low compliance requirements and low operational performance benefits and this gives a better insight into prioritization of managing these content.
Stars
Stars are those content that, as is obvious, have high compliance requirements and are also the backbone to the operational performance of the process.When identifying your BPM and ERM needs, these content must be handled with care.
Cash Cows
These content are not required from a compliance perspective but have great value of the operational needs of the process and hence, need not be marked as a record for retention. Nonetheless, it is always advised to keep such content in retention for a while if not long-term.
Cons:
So what are the cons of this model? Well, it does not address the strategic necessity of content. For e.g., while Marketing Materials have been ranked as a Dog, it need not be so as strategically marketing content have a strong role of play for the organisation.
Also, the compliance laws of various countries may differ and hence, some of the content shown as low may not be so according to some laws.
This post, much like my earlier 5W post, is also just a starting step into evaluating your content. This provides one with a decent start, if not a fully detailed analysis of your content and their relevance in the organization and the process at hand.